row1
Abstract
The success of today’s highly volatile perishables supply chains depends on the level and the timeliness of product visibility. Visibility should provide answers to the questions of `where is my product’ and `what is the condition of my product’. The foundation for such visibility should be an effective and efficient information system enhanced with RFID technology. Already, several companies have begun experimenting with RFID for perishables see sidebar: Experimenting with RFID for Perishables. In this paper, we specifically explore the use of RFID-enabled sensors and examine some sample applications of these sensors in monitoring the condition of perishable products in the supply chain.
Summary
The essay examines the political dynamics surrounding the regulation of RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology, focusing on two primary stages: politicization and policy implementation. Initially, RFID is recognized as a political issue, with various stakeholders—including technology producers, corporations like Wal-Mart, privacy advocates, and government agencies—becoming involved in defining the issue and setting the stage for policy decisions. The essay notes that RFID raises a variety of concerns, such as privacy, environmental impact, job security, and even cultural or religious values, which different constituencies perceive differently.
In the politicization stage, discussions unfold as these groups consult and negotiate, often with the RFID industry itself proposing guidelines to address concerns and mitigate opposition. At the policy implementation stage, decisions are handed over to bureaucratic agencies that interpret and enforce the laws, a process that can significantly affect the real-world application of regulations. The regulatory process is further complicated by overlapping jurisdictional levels—local, state, federal, and international—which can lead to confusion and delayed decision-making.
The essay highlights the power dynamics in the process, where more powerful stakeholders, such as RFID companies, have significant resources to influence policy and delay action. Politicians, especially those with expertise in the area, tend to support RFID technology, while those opposing it often target state or local levels for early victories. Ultimately, the regulation of RFID will depend on how various interests—both pro and con—play their political cards, with the industry’s influence likely to shape the final regulatory framework. The process is marked by caution, procrastination, and an ongoing negotiation between diverse interests.
